Opening Closed Doors
Please note: this article is the third of a three-part series.
To link to the previous article, The Rectification of Pharaoh,
please click here.
Pharaoh lost his free choice only after he had
forced the Jewish people into slavery and tortured them for an extended period;
when G-d later "hardened Pharaoh's heart" this deprival of free choice was
itself the punishment for his previous misdeeds. From this explanation, it would
seem fair to punish Pharaoh only for the sins he committed before his
free choice was taken away, but the consensus of the commentaries is that
Pharaoh was also punished for ignoring the plagues and not allowing the Jewish
people to leave. Since at that point he no longer had free choice, how could he
be punished?
When Can a Prophet Be Wrong?
We can understand this by first examining a closely
related subject - that of teshuva, repentance. It is obvious that doing
teshuva to rectify a misdeed is dependent on having free choice. As long
as one has free choice, a person is able to do teshuva; once free choice
is taken away, teshuva is impossible.  | | " A negative prophecy...can always be annulled through teshuva..." |  |  |
Teshuva is effective even when an explicit
prophecy suggests otherwise. The righteous King Hezekiah didn't marry because he
saw prophetically that if he had children they would be extremely wicked.
Nonetheless, the prophet Isaiah chastised him, "Why do you meddle in G-d's
mysteries?" Hezekiah had no right to refrain from fulfilling the commandment to
have children regardless of the eventual consequences.
Taking the prophet's rebuke to heart, Hezekiah
promptly did teshuva and asked Isaiah to allow him to marry his daughter,
but Isaiah told him that the heavenly decree was final and that he should
prepare to die. Hezekiah answered that a tradition had been passed down in his
family that, "Even if you feel the sword against your neck, it is still not too
late". His teshuva was indeed accepted, and the decree against him was
annulled. (He subsequently fathered a son, Manasseh, who became one of the most
wicked kings in Jewish history.)
This power of teshuva, however, seems to be
effective specifically regarding a prophecy. One of the basic parameters of
prophecy is that a positive prophecy will always come true. A negative prophecy,
however, can always be annulled through teshuva.
A Closed Door
In contrast, we find other cases where no prophecy was
involved, and the door to teshuva seems categorically closed. The Talmud
tells the story about the infamous "Acher", whose original name was Elisha ben
Abuya. He heard a heavenly voice proclaiming, "Everyone in the world can do
teshuva - except for Acher". When he heard this, he decided to abandon
Jewish observance altogether, becoming a paradigm for wickedness.
Similarly, if a person says, "I will sin now, and do
teshuva later", the Torah says, "He is not given the opportunity to do
teshuva". It seems that this person is also being deprived of his free
choice.
There is a logical explanation for this. If he did not
have teshuva to rely on, he would not have sinned in the first place.
Teshuva, therefore, has contributed to his sin. Since it was a kind of
"cause" for the sin, it cannot be used later to rectify the sin. One cannot use
teshuva to perform two opposite functions. In the words of the Talmud:
"The prosecuting attorney (i.e. the teshuva that caused him to sin)
cannot become the defense attorney (i.e. to rectify the sin)."
Overpowering
Nevertheless, we find, paradoxically, that even in
such cases, teshuva is possible. The person is merely "not given the
opportunity to do teshuva". This means that teshuva will not
be made easy for him. He won't be provided with an auspicious time for
teshuva; enormous obstacles might even be placed in his path. But if he
"pushes his way in", his teshuva will be accepted. The door might be
closed in his face; he might not have the key, but if he really wants, he can
knock the door down with the brute force of his deep resolve.  | | " Nothing can stand in the way of teshuva..." |  |  |
This is a much deeper teshuva than normally
required. That is why the principle of "the prosecuting attorney cannot become
the defense attorney" does not apply. The teshuva that the person
originally had in mind was a regular sort of teshuva, and that level of
teshuva is indeed ineffective. This person has employed a brand new
"defense attorney" - a dimension of teshuva which hadn't been previously
imagined.
This is what our Sages meant when they said, "Nothing
can stand in the way of teshuva." Even when the door is closed to
teshuva, there is always a more profound level of teshuva which can
push past it.
Reaching Deeper
That is why the Talmud says that Acher was punished
for his actions. Even though he had heard the heavenly voice announcing that his
teshuva would not be accepted, this should have inspired him to do an
even deeper teshuva, which would have been accepted.
This is also explains how Pharaoh was punished even
after his free choice was denied. Even Pharaoh had the ability to reach deeply
inside himself and do a deeper teshuva, which could transcend this
decree. If he had "pushed his way in", he, too, could have done teshuva.
[Our Sages indeed say that Pharaoh eventually became the king of Nineveh who, as
described in the book of Jonah, led his people to teshuva.]
The principle that, "Nothing can stand in the way of
teshuva", remains absolute. So does the concept of free choice. Even when
G-d "hardened his heart" and deprived him of his free choice, this was only on
the superficial level. Deep within, he still had the ability to choose. And
since he did not exercise it properly, he deserved to be punished.  | | " There are always difficulties that must be overcome..." |  |  |
This leads us to a profound understanding of the
concepts of teshuva and free choice. Every person has factors that
influence his behavior in one direction or another. Their significance could be
exaggerated to the point that a person thinks that these influences deprive him
of his choice, or at least provide some sort of excuse for his actions.
This approach presents an enormous obstacle to
teshuva, because it makes it virtually impossible for the person to take
responsibility for his actions. There are always difficulties that must be
overcome, whether as a product of genetic makeup, upbringing, or environmental
pressures. A person can always claim, "How can G-d expect me to do teshuva
when I have to deal with THAT!"  | | " A person can only do true teshuva when he accepts full responsibility for the transgression...." |  |  |
Such a person will never do proper teshuva,
because he is always looking at the (sometimes valid) rationalizations and
obstacles to teshuva. Ultimately, all excuses are unacceptable, because
even if the obstacles are real, we have the ability to overcome them by digging
deeper within ourselves. If we do not use this ability to surmount the obstacles
to teshuva, it is nobody's responsibility but our own.
It's All Yours
Just as it is with teshuva, the same applies to
the transgression itself. A person can only do true teshuva when he
accepts full responsibility for the transgression. There are many factors that a
person could point to as causes of his transgression: his genetic makeup, etc.,
as mentioned above. But as long as he avoids taking complete responsibility, his
teshuva is incomplete. He will always say that he regrets what he did,
but he will always feel somewhat justified in that he had an excuse.
This is one of the reasons why the issue of free
choice must be clear. If a person feels that he has no free choice, then he
feels that his behavior can be excused - it is not really his to begin with.
Pharaoh seems to have the strongest claim in this
regard, since he could say, "What do you want from me? G-d hardened my heart -
He should be the one to be punished!" But Pharaoh was indeed held responsible,
since although G-d hardened his heart, he still had the ability to act justly. To return to the first article of the series, Why was Pharaoh Punished?, please click here.
Visitor Comments: 1
Jose Reyes,4/9/2004
I must have read the Exodus ac
|
|
|
|